Hedrick v. Commonwealth

21 S.W.2d 651, 231 Ky. 425, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 286
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)·Decided November 8, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*426 Per Curiam:

The transcript of evidence was filed in vacation. There is no order in the record showing its filing, or properly making it a part of the record. The motion to strike it from the record must be sustained. Maynard v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 362, 275 S. W. 871; Ford v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 677, 4 S. W. (2d) 683; Jones v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 273, 8 S. W. (2d) 382.

The appeal is denied, and the judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hedrick v. Commonwealth, 21 S.W.2d 651, 231 Ky. 425, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 286 (Ky. 1929).

21 S.W.2d 651 (Hedrick v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hiles v. Commonwealth
31 S.W.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)