Hedrick v. Commonwealth
This text of 21 S.W.2d 651 (Hedrick v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transcript of evidence was filed in vacation. There is no order in the record showing its filing, or properly making it a part of the record. The motion to strike it from the record must be sustained. Maynard v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky. 362, 275 S. W. 871; Ford v. Commonwealth, 223 Ky. 677, 4 S. W. (2d) 683; Jones v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 273, 8 S. W. (2d) 382.
The appeal is denied, and the judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 S.W.2d 651, 231 Ky. 425, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedrick-v-commonwealth-kyctapphigh-1929.