Hedrick v. Chapman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hedrick v. Chapman

291 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2009 WL 2871117

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 8, 2009

DocketED 92396

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 S.W.3d 860 (Hedrick v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hedrick v. Chapman, 291 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2009 WL 2871117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra DiMeo (“Paternal Grandmother”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting Children’s Division’s (“the Division”) motion to dismiss her Third Party Motion to Modify as to Child Custody, Visitation and Support (“Third Party Motion”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra DiMeo (“Paternal Grandmother”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting Children’s Division’s (“the Division”) motion to dismiss her Third Party Motion to Modify as to Child Custody, Visitation and Support (“Third Party Motion”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 S.W.3d 860, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261, 2009 WL 2871117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedrick-v-chapman-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack