Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

980 P.2d 675, 159 Or. App. 660, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 Or. App. 510
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 14, 1999·No. 9708-06259; CA A100556·Published

Opinion

ROSSMAN, S. J.

Defendant seeks reconsideration of our opinion in this case, Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 158 Or App 510, 974 P2d 755 (1999), in which we determined that defendant had a duty to defend plaintiff in an underlying negligence action under the terms of plaintiffs homeowners’ and catastrophe insurance policies. We allow the motion for the purpose of correcting the disposition line of the opinion. The corrected disposition reads as follows: “Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment determining that defendant had a duty to defend plaintiff in underlying personal injury action.”

Petition for reconsideration allowed; disposition modified to provide: “Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment determining that defendant had a duty to defend plaintiff in underlying personal injury action.”; adhered to as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance, 980 P.2d 675, 159 Or. App. 660, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 516 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

980 P.2d 675 (Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hedmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
974 P.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)