Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works

168 A.D. 931, 152 N.Y.S. 1117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D. 208

Opinion

Without determining whether the amended complaint is sufficient in law, we think that plaintiff should be permitted to serve the same. As terms of the amendment, defendant is entitled to receive its full taxable costs and disbursements of the action to date. Whether the sum allowed ($100) is equal to these or not, we are not in a position to determine. Defendant may, at its election, either receive, as terms of the amendment, such taxable costs and disbursements, but without any extra allowance, or the sum allowed by the learned justice at Special Term. The order as thus [932]*932modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works, 168 A.D. 931, 152 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

168 A.D. 931 (Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.