Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hedgepath v. Bobo

Hedgepath v. Bobo

131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 670, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 469
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket16807
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 192 (Hedgepath v. Bobo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hedgepath v. Bobo, 131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 670, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 469 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The plaintiff sought to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. Upon the conclusion of his testimony the court properly granted a nonsuit. See, in this connection, Hicks v. Brantley, 102 Ga. 264 (29 S. E. 459).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff. Willingham,, Wright & Covington, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Brantley
29 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 670, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedgepath-v-bobo-gactapp-1925.