Hedge v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hedge v. State

877 S.W.2d 90, 317 Ark. 104, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 300

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 16, 1994

DocketCR 94-70

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 877 S.W.2d 90 (Hedge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hedge v. State, 877 S.W.2d 90, 317 Ark. 104, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 300 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record was lodged in this appeal on January 21, 1994, and appellants’ briefs were due on May 2, 1994. More than three months after the record was lodged and less than two weeks before appellants’ briefs are due, counsel for appellants move for the issue of a writ of certiorari to the court reporter to produce materials not in the record and identified only as “part of the trial proceedings.” Appellants also ask for a stay of the briefing schedule.

We grant the motions, at the same time pointing out that hereafter counsel will be expected to examine the record before, or immediately after, it is lodged in this court to determine that nothing essential (and designated) is omitted, if so, to specifically identify the omitted material, and to exercise due diligence in moving to supplement the record.

Writs of certiorari granted and briefing schedule stayed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record was lodged in this appeal on January 21, 1994, and appellants’ briefs were due on May 2, 1994. More than three months after the record was lodged and less than two weeks before appellants’ briefs are due, counsel for appellants move for the issue of a writ of certiorari to the court reporter to produce materials not in the record and identified only as “part of the trial proceedings.” Appellants also ask for a stay of the briefing schedule.

We grant the motions, at the same time pointing out that hereafter counsel will be expected to examine the record before, or immediately after, it is lodged in this court to determine that nothing essential (and designated) is omitted, if so, to specifically identify the omitted material, and to exercise due diligence in moving to supplement the record.

Writs of certiorari granted and briefing schedule stayed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

877 S.W.2d 90, 317 Ark. 104, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedge-v-state-ark-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack