Hedeman v. Hedeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hedeman v. Hedeman

46 A.D.2d 887, 363 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 887 (Hedeman v. Hedeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hedeman v. Hedeman, 46 A.D.2d 887, 363 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff husband had been granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 29, 1974, which (a) denied her motion (1) to punish plaintiff for contempt for his failure fully to comply with the support requirements in the judgment, (2) for a money judgment for the arrears and (3) for a counsel fee for the bringing of the motion; and (b) upon plaintiff’s request in his affidavit in opposition to the motion, modified the judgment with respect to support payments for the parties’ son. Case remitted to Special Term for a hearing and determination upon the issue of possible support payments due to defendant for child support for the parties’ son for the period from April to September, 1973, inclusive. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which the plaintiff husband had been granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 29, 1974, which (a) denied her motion (1) to punish plaintiff for contempt for his failure fully to comply with the support requirements in the judgment, (2) for a money judgment for the arrears and (3) for a counsel fee for the bringing of the motion; and (b) upon plaintiff’s request in his affidavit in opposition to the motion, modified the judgment with respect to support payments for the parties’ son. Case remitted to Special Term for a hearing and determination upon the issue of possible support payments due to defendant for child support for the parties’ son for the period from April to September, 1973, inclusive. Appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 887, 363 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedeman-v-hedeman-nyappdiv-1974.