Heddleston, B. v. OBGYN Associates
This text of Heddleston, B. v. OBGYN Associates (Heddleston, B. v. OBGYN Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
BRIAN HEDDLESTON, INDIVIDUALLY : No. 57 WAL 2022 AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE : ESTATE OF MARIA HEDDLESTON, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : : v. : : : OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL : ASSOCIATES OF PITTSBURGH INC. : D/B/A OB/GYN ASSOCIATES OF : PITTSBURGH, RENATA D. HOCA, M.D., : PEDIATRIC ALLIANCE, P.C., D/B/A THE : BREASTFEEDING CENTER OF : PITTSBURGH, NANCY BRENT, M.D., : LUCAS GODINEZ, D.O., ALICIA : HARTUNG, D.O., MAGEE-WOMENS : HOSPITAL-UPMC, AND UPMC, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Heddleston, B. v. OBGYN Associates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heddleston-b-v-obgyn-associates-pa-2022.