Hedden v. Borough of Verona

82 A. 880, 82 N.J.L. 736, 53 Vroom 736, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 295
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 880 (Hedden v. Borough of Verona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hedden v. Borough of Verona, 82 A. 880, 82 N.J.L. 736, 53 Vroom 736, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 295 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 880, 82 N.J.L. 736, 53 Vroom 736, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedden-v-borough-of-verona-nj-1912.