Hedaya v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 317, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1749
United States Customs Court·Decided October 24, 1966·No. C.D. 2801·Published

Opinion

Richardson, Judge:

It is claimed in the instant protest, among other things, that duty was assessed on a greater quantity of merchandise than that which was actually imported. The protest was submitted to the court upon a stipulation which reads as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED BETWEEN COUNSEL for the parties hereto, in the matter of the above protest, that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer or by any other person for account of the importer; that said quantities consisted of the following: One carton containing 12 dozen majorettes-stuffed dolls, out of HC 2016-cartons 1/38, and four cartons containing 3 sets each of suit cases, out HC 1090A-cartons 1/89; and that no allowance was made in liquidation of the entry for the duties upon such quantities.
[318]*318IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above protest is limited to the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, and that said protest may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as evidence of the facts, we hold that the claim in the protest that duty was assessed upon a greater quantity of merchandise than that which was actually imported, is sustained. As to all other claims and merchandise, the protest is overruled.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hedaya v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 317, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1749 (cusc 1966).

57 Cust. Ct. 317 (Hedaya v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.