Hedaya Importing Co. v. Unitec States

U.S. Customs Court

Hedaya Importing Co. v. Unitec States

6 Cust. Ct. 913, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1236

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 18, 1941

DocketNo. 5221; Entry No. 774773, etc.

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Cust. Ct. 913 (Hedaya Importing Co. v. Unitec States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hedaya Importing Co. v. Unitec States, 6 Cust. Ct. 913, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1236 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein and the issue in United States v. Kohlberg, C. A. D. 88, is the same; that the market value or price at or about the dates of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the appraised value, less any amount added under duress, and that there was no higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable - export value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein and the issue in United States v. Kohlberg, C. A. D. 88, is the same; that the market value or price at or about the dates of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the appraised value, less any amount added under duress, and that there was no higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable - export value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Cust. Ct. 913, 1941 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedaya-importing-co-v-unitec-states-cusc-1941.