Hector v. Shuttle Express Coach, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hector v. Shuttle Express Coach, Inc.

212 A.D.2d 759, 624 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2200

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1995·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated October 28, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Based upon the affidavit of Dr. Danielle Registre Opam, the plaintiff Agatha Hector has raised a triable issue of fact with regard to her claim that she sustained "serious injury” (see, Lamarre v Troop, 202 AD2d 645). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated October 28, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Based upon the affidavit of Dr. Danielle Registre Opam, the plaintiff Agatha Hector has raised a triable issue of fact with regard to her claim that she sustained "serious injury” (see, Lamarre v Troop, 202 AD2d 645). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Hector v. Shuttle Express Coach, Inc., 212 A.D.2d 759, 624 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

212 A.D.2d 759 (Hector v. Shuttle Express Coach, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related