Hector Supply Co. v. Lathan

Supreme Court of Florida

Hector Supply Co. v. Lathan

167 So. 2d 311

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 16, 1964

DocketNo. 33544

StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 311 (Hector Supply Co. v. Lathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hector Supply Co. v. Lathan, 167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

jPER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we lhave for review an order of the Florida ilndustrial Commission bearing date April -28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve -no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate -Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the ; record and briefs leads us to conclude that -there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is ■ therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROB-1ERTS and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

jPER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we lhave for review an order of the Florida ilndustrial Commission bearing date April -28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve -no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate -Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the ; record and briefs leads us to conclude that -there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is ■ therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROB-1ERTS and ERVIN, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 So. 2d 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hector-supply-co-v-lathan-fla-1964.