Hector Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 2, 2015·No. 04-15-00124-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 31, 2015

No. 04-15-00124-CR

Hector RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR2894 The Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion for extension of time to file a motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that his client has been deported and he is having difficulty getting his client’s signature on the motion to dismiss notarized. He requests this court authorize him to submit the motion without notarization. We GRANT his request and his extension of time. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) does not require appellant’s signature to be notarized. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of August, 2015.

Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hector Ramirez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Hector Ramirez v. State (Hector Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.