Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars. Read the opinion of the Court — 845 F.3d 925
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2018·No. 13-55323·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HECTOR NAVARRO; MIKE No. 13-55323 SHIRINIAN; ANTHONY PINKINS; KEVIN MALONE; REUBEN CASTRO, D.C. No.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:12-cv-08051-

RGK-MRW

v.

ENCINO MOTORCARS, LLC, ORDER erroneously sued as Mercedes Benz of Encino, Defendant-Appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 19, 2018

Before: Susan P. Graber and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and James C. Mahan,* District Judge.

ORDER

On remand from the Supreme Court, Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138 S. Ct. 1134 (2018), no further issues remain. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, (9th Cir. 2018).

Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars (Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
584 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 2018)