Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars
This text of Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars (Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HECTOR NAVARRO; MIKE No. 13-55323 SHIRINIAN; ANTHONY PINKINS; KEVIN MALONE; REUBEN CASTRO, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:12-cv-08051- RGK-MRW v.
ENCINO MOTORCARS, LLC, ORDER erroneously sued as Mercedes Benz of Encino, Defendant-Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 19, 2018
Before: Susan P. Graber and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and James C. Mahan,* District Judge.
ORDER
On remand from the Supreme Court, Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138 S. Ct. 1134 (2018), no further issues remain. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
* The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hector-navarro-v-encino-motorcars-ca9-2018.