Hector Milla-Perez v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 653 F. App'x 858 (Hector Milla-Perez v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Hector Neptaly Milla-Perez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion.to reopen. Bhasin v, Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review and we remand.
The BIA abused its discretion in denying Milla-Perez’s motion to reopen because it discredited the testimony in his supporting declaration. Nee id. at 986-87 (“We have long held that credibility determinations on motions to reopen are inappropriate. Indeed, facts presented in affidavits supporting a motion to reopen must be accepted as true unless inherently unbelievable.”) (citation omitted). Thus, the BIA abused its discretion in denying Mil-la-Perez’s motion to reopen. See id. at 989. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
653 F. App'x 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hector-milla-perez-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.