Hector Javier Rodriguez Alvarado v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 19, 2018·No. 13-18-00444-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00444-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

HECTOR JAVIER RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Order Per Curiam Appellant’s counsel, Allegra Hill, has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as

counsel. According to her motion to withdraw, good cause exists for her to withdraw

because she has accepted a position with the Office of the Governor and will no longer

be practicing appellate law or available to represent private parties. Counsel requests

this Court abate the appeal. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to abate the appeal and REMAND

the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter

an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,

the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall

further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the

Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2.

Delivered and filed this the 19th day of September, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hector Javier Rodriguez Alvarado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Hector Javier Rodriguez Alvarado v. State (Hector Javier Rodriguez Alvarado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. State
176 S.W.3d 249 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)