Hector Giagnocovo v. the State of Texas
This text of Hector Giagnocovo v. the State of Texas (Hector Giagnocovo v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00567-CR
HECTOR GIAGNOCOVO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1599067
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant was sentenced to two years’ incarceration on May 10, 2022. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, to be timely, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by June 9, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).
A court of appeals may grant an extension of time if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files (a) the notice of appeal in the trial court, and (b) a motion for extension of time in the court of appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2) (governing motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal). Accounting for a weekend, this meant a motion for extension of time had to be filed by June 26, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a).
Appellant filed the underlying notice of appeal on July 31, 2024,1 a date that is not within 15 days of the due date.
A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). When a notice of appeal is not filed within the 15-day period, the court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.2 See id.
On August 8, 2024, the parties were notified that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
1 Appellant also filed another notice of appeal from the judgment on December 9, 2022. See Giagnocovo v. State, No. 14-22-00917-CR, 2023 WL 370522, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 24, 2023, no pet.) (per curiam). That appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 2 This necessarily means that any subsequent notices of appeal that seek review of the trial court’s May 10, 2022 judgment will be likewise untimely and will also leave no basis for exercising appellate jurisdiction regarding that judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hector Giagnocovo v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hector-giagnocovo-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.