Hector Florez v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hector Florez v. the State of Texas

DecidedAugust 15, 2024

Docket11-23-00195-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Hector Florez v. the State of Texas (Hector Florez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hector Florez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Hector Florez, * From the 142nd District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CR43113.

Vs. No. 11-23-00195-CR * August 15, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s revocation judgment insofar as the trial court assessed delinquent fines, attorney’s fees, costs, and restitution against Appellant, and we affirm the trial court’s revocation judgment in all other respects. We remand this cause to the trial court for the limited purpose of performing the “ability to pay” inquiry and, if necessary, modifying its revocation judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Hector Florez, * From the 142nd District Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CR43113.

Vs. No. 11-23-00195-CR * August 15, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s revocation judgment insofar as the trial court assessed delinquent fines, attorney’s fees, costs, and restitution against Appellant, and we affirm the trial court’s revocation judgment in all other respects. We remand this cause to the trial court for the limited purpose of performing the “ability to pay” inquiry and, if necessary, modifying its revocation judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hector Florez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hector-florez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.