Hector Estrada, Isela Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v. Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00014-CV Style: Hector Estrada, Iselda Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v Daner Lee Cheshire, Lyndon Charles Cheshire, and Stewart Title Company Date motion filed*: April 1, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to substitute counsel Party filing motion: Appellees Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellees Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire have filed a motion to substitute counsel, which is granted. See TEX. APP. P. 6.5(d). The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute attorney Timothy A. Hootman for Rhoda Ross as appellees’ counsel of record. We further notify appellees that this substitution will not affect any pending deadlines in this appeal.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: April 17, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hector Estrada, Isela Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v. Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire (Hector Estrada, Isela Estrada, Maria Martinez, and Jorge Gonzales v. Daner Lee Cheshire and Lyndon Charles Cheshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.