Hector Calderon v. Roy B. Ferguson and Pene S. Ferguson
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ HECTOR CALDERON, No. 08-08-00265-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 394th District Court § ROY B. FERGUSON and of Jeff Davis County, Texas PENE S. FERGUSON, § (TC #2237) Appellees. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX .R.APP .P.
42.1 because the parties have settled all matters in controversy. We grant the motion and dismiss
the appeal with prejudice. The joint motion does not state the parties have agreed regarding the
assessment of costs. Accordingly, we assess costs against Appellant. See TEX .R.APP .P. 42.1(d)
(absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant).
May 28, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Ret.) Barajas, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hector Calderon v. Roy B. Ferguson and Pene S. Ferguson (Hector Calderon v. Roy B. Ferguson and Pene S. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.