Heckstall v. Citizens Bank of Windsor
This text of 163 S.E. 107 (Heckstall v. Citizens Bank of Windsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe principal questions in controversy were whether the deposit was general or special and whether the plaintiff was entitled to a preference in the administration of the bank’s assets. In effect the jury found that the deposit was special and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the value of the bonds. We have considered all the assignments of error and find no error. Corporation Commission v. Trust Co., 193 N. C., 696; Parker v. Central Bank and Trust Company, ante, 230.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 S.E. 107, 202 N.C. 350, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heckstall-v-citizens-bank-of-windsor-nc-1932.