Heckman v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Heckman v. Director of Revenue

443 S.W.3d 47, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2014 WL 4702573

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. ED 100853·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Heckman appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustaining a one-year revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol content. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, [48] however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Heckman appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustaining a one-year revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol content. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, [48] however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Heckman v. Director of Revenue, 443 S.W.3d 47, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1056, 2014 WL 4702573 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

443 S.W.3d 47 (Heckman v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.