Heckman v. Champlin

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Heckman v. Champlin

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 76

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedApril 29, 1918

DocketNo.41842

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 76 (Heckman v. Champlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heckman v. Champlin, 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 76 (R.I. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

DORAN, J.

The new testimony might contradict defendant’s agent in some respects, otherwise it is mainly cumulative. It is claimed that plaintiff’s servants cannot be right. It is true one would not expect a broker to advance more than the expense of getting out the lumber and would expect that the entire selling price would be greater than the expense of getting the lumber 'out, but the Court is not in a position to demonstrate where the accounts are wrong.

Petition for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DORAN, J.

The new testimony might contradict defendant’s agent in some respects, otherwise it is mainly cumulative. It is claimed that plaintiff’s servants cannot be right. It is true one would not expect a broker to advance more than the expense of getting out the lumber and would expect that the entire selling price would be greater than the expense of getting the lumber 'out, but the Court is not in a position to demonstrate where the accounts are wrong.

Petition for new trial denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heckman-v-champlin-risuperct-1918.