Heckler v. Kuehner

Supreme Court

Heckler v. Kuehner

469 U.S. 977, 105 S. Ct. 376, 83 L. Ed. 2d 312, 53 U.S.L.W. 3341, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4235

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 5, 1984·No. No. 83-1593·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to be remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with instructions to: (1) remand the cases of the named respondents to the Secretary for review pursuant to § 2(d)(2)(C) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984; (2) make any necessary clarifications in the definition and scope of the class; (3) remand the cases of the unnamed class members to the Secretary for proceedings pursuant to § 2(d)(3) of that Act; and (4) take other actions appropriate in light of that Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to be remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with instructions to: (1) remand the cases of the named respondents to the Secretary for review pursuant to § 2(d)(2)(C) of the Social Security Disability Benefits Reform Act of 1984; (2) make any necessary clarifications in the definition and scope of the class; (3) remand the cases of the unnamed class members to the Secretary for proceedings pursuant to § 2(d)(3) of that Act; and (4) take other actions appropriate in light of that Act.

Heckler v. Kuehner, 469 U.S. 977, 105 S. Ct. 376, 83 L. Ed. 2d 312, 53 U.S.L.W. 3341, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4235 (1984).

Pincite

469 U.S. 977 (Heckler v. Kuehner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related