Hecking v. Eagle Pencil Co.
This text of 27 F. Supp. 815 (Hecking v. Eagle Pencil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I am of the opinion that this motion should be denied.
True, the New Jersey action was commenced first; yet the chain of circumstances which led to the- bringing of the New Jersey action was started by the attorney for the plaintiffs herein, when he wrote (March 10, 1938) to the defendant, Eagle Pencil Company, Inc., regarding an alleged infringement by that defendant of the alleged patent right of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs have -elected to sue the Eagle Pencil Company, Inc., whom they claim, as far as they are concerned, to be the direct infringer. All the matters in dispute between these plaintiffs and this defendant can be adjudicated in this action, including that of an accounting by the said defendant to the plaintiffs, if plaintiffs should be successful.
The Eagle Pencil Company, Inc., is not a party in the New Jersey action.
The plaintiffs have not unduly delayed the commencement of their action. Neither do I find that they have used dilatory tactics in the New Jersey action.
The plaintiffs should not be compelled to await the trial of the New Jersey action to have their rights, as between themselves and the Eagle Pencil Company, Inc., determined.
It further appears that this action is on the non-jury reserve calendar of this Court with every prospect of an early trial. There is no indication in the moving papers herein that the New Jersey action may be reached for trial except that the attorney for the plaintiffs states as follows : “Deponent is also informed that due to shortage of judges in the District of New Jersey, the Pfanstiehl Chemk:al Company case cannot be reached for a long period of time.” This statement has not been denied.
[816]*816Under all the circumstances, plaintiffs should have the right to have their case against the defendant Eagle Pencil Company, Inc., tri'ed when reached. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 F. Supp. 815, 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 772, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecking-v-eagle-pencil-co-nysd-1939.