Hecker v. Tolve

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hecker v. Tolve

130 A.D.2d 713, 515 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 713 (Hecker v. Tolve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hecker v. Tolve, 130 A.D.2d 713, 515 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Tolve and Frito Lay Company and the third-party defendant County of Westchester appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered June 23, 1986, which denied their motion for a change of venue from Bronx to Westchester County and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to retain venue in Bronx County.

[714]*714Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On this record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the action to remain in Bronx County. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Tolve and Frito Lay Company and the third-party defendant County of Westchester appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered June 23, 1986, which denied their motion for a change of venue from Bronx to Westchester County and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to retain venue in Bronx County.

[714]*714Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On this record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the action to remain in Bronx County. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 713, 515 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecker-v-tolve-nyappdiv-1987.