Hecker v. De Groot

15 How. Pr. 314
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 15 How. Pr. 314 (Hecker v. De Groot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hecker v. De Groot, 15 How. Pr. 314 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

Opinion

Clerke, Justice.

The defendants are sued for damages occasioned by a fraud committed by them. It matters not in what capacity they acted, or with whom they co-operated. They were instrumental in perpetrating the acts constituting the fraud. This is admitted by the demurrer. If indeed a person is the unconscious instrument of others in committing an injury, he is not personally liable for the consequences; but, where he knowingly engages in an unlawful course, whether for his own immediate benefit or not, he cannot escape liability by showing that he acted as an agent.

The amount of damages is never the subject of demurrer. This is to be determined at the trial.

Demurrer overruled, with liberty to answer in twenty days, on payment of costs of term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Wells
228 A.D. 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
McDermott v. Conley
11 N.Y.S. 403 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Frost v. Kopp
13 N.Y. St. Rep. 707 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1887)
Crane v. Onderdonk
67 Barb. 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1873)
Byers v. Rodabaugh
17 Iowa 53 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 How. Pr. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecker-v-de-groot-nysupct-1857.