Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Bernstein

142 Misc. 501, 254 N.Y.S. 588, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 915
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 8, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence establishes that the defendant was an infant when the merchandise was purchased. The plaintiff, therefore, could not recover on the contract of sale nor could the defendant be required to pay the reasonable value of the merchandise with which he has since parted as a condition of pleading infancy. (Green v. Green, 69 N. Y. 553.) Moreover, the defendant is not hable in tort for any misrepresentation concerning his age implied from the fact that he purchased the merchandise. (International Text Book Co. v. Connelly, 206 N. Y. 188.)

Judgment and order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Bernstein, 142 Misc. 501, 254 N.Y.S. 588, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

142 Misc. 501 (Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Text Book Co. v. . Connelly
99 N.E. 722 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Green v. . Green
69 N.Y. 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)