Heck v. Bugen
This text of 111 A. 160 (Heck v. Bugen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The wife of the testator took an absolute third interest in his estate, for she survived him. His testamentary disposition of his entire estate was clearly contingent upon her dying in his lifetime, and, as that contingency did not occur, the correct conclusion of the learned president judge of the court below was that the disposition fell and intestacy followed as to two-thirds of his estate. The plaintiffs having acquired two-thirds of the property involved in this proceeding by descent from their father, and the other third as heirs of their mother, who died intestate, the title which they tendered to the appellant is good, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 A. 160, 268 Pa. 261, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heck-v-bugen-pa-1920.