Heck v. Battistee
This text of 189 S.W. 25 (Heck v. Battistee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
This was a proceeding under section 104 of the Kentucky Statutes to suspend the appellant, an attorney at law, from practicing his profession because he wrongfully failed and refused on demand to pay over money that he had collected for his .client.
The questions in the case are purely of fact, and we are not disposed to interfere with the finding of the judge of the lower court on the facts that the appellant [235]*235violated the statute and was subject to the penalty therefor. The facts are very brief and very simple and it would serve no useful purpose to set them out here.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 S.W. 25, 172 Ky. 234, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heck-v-battistee-kyctapp-1916.