Hecht v. Yarnis
This text of 268 A.D. 771 (Hecht v. Yarnis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. (Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N. Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 771, 50 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecht-v-yarnis-nyappdiv-1944.