Hecht v. Yarnis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hecht v. Yarnis

268 A.D. 771, 50 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1944·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. (Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N. Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is barred by article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act. (Josephson v. Dry Dock Savings Institution, 266 App. Div. 992, affd. 292 N. Y. 666, and Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N. Y. 685.) Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term to the defendant, and the judgment and order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Appellate Term. [See post, p. 850.]

Hecht v. Yarnis, 268 A.D. 771, 50 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

268 A.D. 771 (Hecht v. Yarnis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related