Hecht v. Flatto
This text of 158 Misc. 464 (Hecht v. Flatto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is nothing in sections 1077-a, 1077-b and 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act which prevents the bringing of an action against a guarantor for an unpaid installment of interest.
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and order granting defendant’s cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed, with ten dollars costs; plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted, and defendant’s motion denied.
All concur. Present —■ Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Misc. 464, 285 N.Y.S. 949, 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecht-v-flatto-nyappterm-1936.