Hecht v. Cardinal

140 So. 648, 103 Fla. 930
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 21, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Bueord, C.J.

This was a suit to cancel a tax deed.

General and special demurrers were filed attacking a second amended bill of complaint. The demurrers were overruled, from which order appealed was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed tapón authority of the opinion and judgment in the ease of Tax Securities Corporation, a Florida Corporation vs. Peggie Borland, et al., opinion filed at this term of Court. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hecht v. Cardinal, 140 So. 648, 103 Fla. 930 (Fla. 1931).

140 So. 648 (Hecht v. Cardinal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Overstreet v. Gordon
163 So. 477 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Florida Land Holding Corp. v. Lee
159 So. 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Hecht v. Shaw, Et Ux.
151 So. 333 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)