Hecht v. Cardinal

Supreme Court of Florida

Hecht v. Cardinal

140 So. 648, 103 Fla. 930

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 21, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 140 So. 648 (Hecht v. Cardinal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hecht v. Cardinal, 140 So. 648, 103 Fla. 930 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinions

Bueord, C.J.

This was a suit to cancel a tax deed.

General and special demurrers were filed attacking a second amended bill of complaint. The demurrers were overruled, from which order appealed was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed tapón authority of the opinion and judgment in the ease of Tax Securities Corporation, a Florida Corporation vs. Peggie Borland, et al., opinion filed at this term of Court. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bueord, C.J.

This was a suit to cancel a tax deed.

General and special demurrers were filed attacking a second amended bill of complaint. The demurrers were overruled, from which order appealed was taken.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed tapón authority of the opinion and judgment in the ease of Tax Securities Corporation, a Florida Corporation vs. Peggie Borland, et al., opinion filed at this term of Court. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 648, 103 Fla. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hecht-v-cardinal-fla-1931.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack