Hechinger v. REBERT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hechinger v. REBERT

973 A.2d 411, 601 Pa. 380, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 959

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 27, 2009

Docket38 MM 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 973 A.2d 411 (Hechinger v. REBERT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hechinger v. REBERT, 973 A.2d 411, 601 Pa. 380, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 959 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED to the extent that it requests leave to file original process, and is DENIED in all other respects. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus *381 and/or Extraordinary Relief is also DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED to the extent that it requests leave to file original process, and is DENIED in all other respects. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus *381 and/or Extraordinary Relief is also DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 A.2d 411, 601 Pa. 380, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hechinger-v-rebert-pa-2009.