Hechinger v. REBERT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hechinger v. REBERT

973 A.2d 411, 601 Pa. 380, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 959

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 38 MM 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED to the extent that it requests leave to file original process, and is DENIED in all other respects. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus *381 and/or Extraordinary Relief is also DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED to the extent that it requests leave to file original process, and is DENIED in all other respects. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus *381 and/or Extraordinary Relief is also DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.

Hechinger v. REBERT, 973 A.2d 411, 601 Pa. 380, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 959 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

973 A.2d 411 (Hechinger v. REBERT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.