Hebert v. Winn

24 La. Ann. 385
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1872·No. No. 3859·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Howell, J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal, on several grounds, accompanies tlie record, but does not seem to be urged by the movers. An examination of the grounds, however, satisfies us that they are insufficient. The delay in filing the transcript arose from tlie necessity of the appellants to take out a mandamus upon the clerk of the lower court. Tlie parties are all properly before the court, the appeal brought up having been taken on motion in open court at the same time when the judgment was rendered, and the appeal bond is in due form and signed by the security.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hebert v. Winn, 24 La. Ann. 385 (La. 1872).

24 La. Ann. 385 (Hebert v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Aguilera
956 So. 2d 718 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
Succession of Bernice H. Aguilera
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007
Fox v. Corry
89 So. 410 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)
Succession of Drysdale
46 So. 873 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)