Hebert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hebert v. State

636 So. 2d 874, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4739, 1994 WL 182021

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hebert v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 600 So. 2d 1293 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1994·No. No. 93-2715·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David A. Hebert has appealed from sentence imposed following a plea of nolo con-tendere to issuing a worthless bank check. We affirm with directions.

Hebert’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), averring that he can make no good faith argument for reversal. The independent review of the record required by State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987), similarly reveals no reversible error. However, Exhibit A of the August 12, 1993 written restitution order reflects an amount due to Gayfer’s of $184.76. The actual amount due, as indicated in the information filed June 28, 1993, is $164.76.

We therefore affirm, with directions that the August 12, 1993 written restitution order be corrected to reflect that the amount due to Gayfer’s is $164.76, and that the total restitution due be adjusted accordingly.

Affirmed with directions.

ZEHMER, C.J., SMITH, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David A. Hebert has appealed from sentence imposed following a plea of nolo con-tendere to issuing a worthless bank check. We affirm with directions.

Hebert’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), averring that he can make no good faith argument for reversal. The independent review of the record required by State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987), similarly reveals no reversible error. However, Exhibit A of the August 12, 1993 written restitution order reflects an amount due to Gayfer’s of $184.76. The actual amount due, as indicated in the information filed June 28, 1993, is $164.76.

We therefore affirm, with directions that the August 12, 1993 written restitution order be corrected to reflect that the amount due to Gayfer’s is $164.76, and that the total restitution due be adjusted accordingly.

Affirmed with directions.

ZEHMER, C.J., SMITH, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Hebert v. State, 636 So. 2d 874, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4739, 1994 WL 182021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

636 So. 2d 874 (Hebert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related