Hebert v. New Departure Hyatt Bearings, Division of General Motors
This text of 541 A.2d 549 (Hebert v. New Departure Hyatt Bearings, Division of General Motors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant has, in essence, attacked the factual findings of the commissioner which were upheld by the compensation review division. Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs clearly indicates that there was ample evidence to support the commissioner’s finding that all of the plaintiff’s back injuries were causally related to his original work-related injury. Further, there is ample evidence to support the commissioner’s factual finding that the defendant was legally noticed under General Statutes § 31-294.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 A.2d 549, 14 Conn. App. 819, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hebert-v-new-departure-hyatt-bearings-division-of-general-motors-connappct-1988.