Hebert v. Couture

31 A.2d 61, 92 N.H. 524, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 128
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMarch 2, 1943
DocketNo. 3365.
StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.2d 61 (Hebert v. Couture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hebert v. Couture, 31 A.2d 61, 92 N.H. 524, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 128 (N.H. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court found in effect that the plaintiffs had failed to sustain the burden of persuasion which rested upon them with reference to the essential allegations of the bill. The decree for the defendant followed as a necessary consequence of this finding. Under these circumstances, plaintiffs’ exception to the action of the court raises no question of law. Analogous cases are Association Canado-Americaine v. Marquis, 90 N. H. 125; Bacon v. Thompson, 87 N. H. 270; Erisman Company v. Company, 87 N. H. 483.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.2d 61, 92 N.H. 524, 1943 N.H. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hebert-v-couture-nh-1943.