Hebert v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hebert v. Celotex Corp.

456 So. 2d 151, 1984 La. LEXIS 9563

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 14, 1984·No. No. 84-C-1120·Published

Opinion

In re Clifton Hebert, applying for writ of certiorari to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 83-CA-821; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, No. 268-454, Division F.

Granted. The Court of Appeal and District Court judgments are amended. The plaintiffs suit is dismissed, reserving to plaintiff the right to file another compensation claim if and when he becomes disabled as the result of an occupational disease, and reserving the defendant’s right to assert a plea of preemption as well as other exceptions or pleas to any suit which may be hereafter brought by plaintiff. See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., 250 La. 43, 193 So.2d 779 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clifton Hebert, applying for writ of certiorari to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 83-CA-821; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, No. 268-454, Division F.

Granted. The Court of Appeal and District Court judgments are amended. The plaintiffs suit is dismissed, reserving to plaintiff the right to file another compensation claim if and when he becomes disabled as the result of an occupational disease, and reserving the defendant’s right to assert a plea of preemption as well as other exceptions or pleas to any suit which may be hereafter brought by plaintiff. See LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., 250 La. 43, 193 So.2d 779 (1967).

Hebert v. Celotex Corp., 456 So. 2d 151, 1984 La. LEXIS 9563 (La. 1984).

Pincite

456 So. 2d 151 (Hebert v. Celotex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related