Hebb ex rel. Hebb v. Meier

393 P.2d 1022, 193 Kan. 342
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 14, 1964
DocketNo. 43,549
StatusPublished

This text of 393 P.2d 1022 (Hebb ex rel. Hebb v. Meier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hebb ex rel. Hebb v. Meier, 393 P.2d 1022, 193 Kan. 342 (kan 1964).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition in an action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle collision.

The case is a companion to the case of Redmond v. Meier, 192 Kan. 730, 391 P. 2d 39. In the Redmond case the action was brought by the driver of the automobile. In the present case the action was brought on behalf of a minor who was a passenger in the automobile.

The issues on appeal are the same in the two cases and the Redmond case controls the decision in this case.

We held in the Redmond case that the demurrer to the second amended petition was improperly sustained. Our reasons for so holding, as set forth in the opinion in the Redmond case, are incorporated herein by reference.

We, therefore, conclude in this case that the order sustaining the demurrer to the second amended petition was erroneous.

The conclusion reached renders unnecessary a discussion of G. S. 1949, 60-307 which extends the period of limitation as to persons under legal disability.

The judgment is reversed with instructions to overrule the demurrer.

APPROVED BY THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redmond v. Meier
391 P.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 P.2d 1022, 193 Kan. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hebb-ex-rel-hebb-v-meier-kan-1964.