Heavner v. Clarke

229 A.D. 786
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff’s motion for a stay and denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion for stay denied, without costs, and motion to dismiss complaint granted, with ten dollars costs. Under section 40 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, as amended by chapter 439 of the Laws of 1921 and chapter 100 of the Laws of 1924, the Surrogate’s Court is given jurisdiction to determine whether or not the general release given by the plaintiff to the defendant was obtained by fraud. (Matter of Cook, 244 N. Y. 63; Matter of Malcomson, 188 App. Div. 600; Matter of Raymond v. Davis, 248 N. Y. 67.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heavner v. Clarke, 229 A.D. 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

229 A.D. 786 (Heavner v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Meyer
277 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
In re the Estate of Sand
178 Misc. 179 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1942)