HEATZIG v. MacLEAN
This text of 670 S.E.2d 564 (HEATZIG v. MacLEAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marina HEATZIG, Plaintiff
v.
Elizabeth MacLEAN, Defendant,
v.
B.A. MacLean and Wife, Charlotte MacLean, Intervenor Defendants and Cross-Complainants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
K. Edward Greene, D. Caldwell Barefoot, Jr., Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, for MacLean.
Karen P. Davidson, Narendra K. Ghosh, Chapel Hill, Burton Craige, Raleigh, for Heatzig.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 347.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of September 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of September 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of December 2008."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 S.E.2d 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heatzig-v-maclean-nc-2008.