Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Heaton v. State

Heaton v. State

76 Ga. App. 141
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 15, 1947
Docket31776
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Ga. App. 141 (Heaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heaton v. State, 76 Ga. App. 141 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

MacIntyre, P. J.

Considering the evidence in its most favorable light to upholding the verdict, it authorized the conviction of the defendant on count one of the indictment charging the larceny of an automobile, and on count two of the indictment charging the larceny of a separate automobile on a different day; the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial which contained the usual general grounds only. Morris v. State, 47 Ga. App. 792 (171 S. E. 555).

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur. George W. Westmoreland, Gordon Smith, for plaintiff in error. Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, J. Walter LeCraw, William T. Boyd, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. State
171 S.E. 555 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ga. App. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-v-state-gactapp-1947.