Heaton v. . Heaton

146 S.E. 146, 196 N.C. 475, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 9, 1929·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

BeogdeN, J.

Tbe indexing and tbe cross-indexing of deeds, mortgages and deeds of trust is an essential part of tbe registration thereof. Therefore a deed, mortgage, or deed of trust not properly indexed and cross-indexed is not properly registered, and registration is necessary to *476 defeat tbe rights of subsequent purchasers for value. N. C. Code 1927, sec. 3561, requires that “the naines of the parties to all liens, etc.,” shall be shown on the index. The indexing of the instrument in controversy did not comply with the statute; hence the ruling of the trial judge was correct. Clement v. Harrison, 193 N. C., 825, 138 S. E., 308.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heaton v. . Heaton, 146 S.E. 146, 196 N.C. 475, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 18 (N.C. 1929).

146 S.E. 146 (Heaton v. . Heaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Badger v. Benfield
337 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Cuthrell v. Camden County
118 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Johnson Cotton Company v. Hobgood
90 S.E.2d 541 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Dorman v. . Goodman
196 S.E. 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Woodley v. . Gregory
171 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Watkins v. Simonds
164 S.E. 363 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Story v. . Slade
155 S.E. 256 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
West v. . Jackson
153 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)