Heaton v. . Heaton

146 S.E. 146, 196 N.C. 475, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 18
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 9, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 146 (Heaton v. . Heaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heaton v. . Heaton, 146 S.E. 146, 196 N.C. 475, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 18 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

BeogdeN, J.

Tbe indexing and tbe cross-indexing of deeds, mortgages and deeds of trust is an essential part of tbe registration thereof. Therefore a deed, mortgage, or deed of trust not properly indexed and cross-indexed is not properly registered, and registration is necessary to *476 defeat tbe rights of subsequent purchasers for value. N. C. Code 1927, sec. 3561, requires that “the naines of the parties to all liens, etc.,” shall be shown on the index. The indexing of the instrument in controversy did not comply with the statute; hence the ruling of the trial judge was correct. Clement v. Harrison, 193 N. C., 825, 138 S. E., 308.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Badger v. Benfield
337 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Cuthrell v. Camden County
118 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Johnson Cotton Company v. Hobgood
90 S.E.2d 541 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Dorman v. . Goodman
196 S.E. 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Woodley v. . Gregory
171 S.E. 65 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Watkins v. Simonds
164 S.E. 363 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Story v. . Slade
155 S.E. 256 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
West v. . Jackson
153 S.E. 257 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 146, 196 N.C. 475, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-v-heaton-nc-1929.