Heaton v. . Calhoun
125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 833, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 219
This text of 125 S.E. 925 (Heaton v. . Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heaton v. . Calhoun, 125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 833, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 219 (N.C. 1924).
Opinion
¥e have beard tbe arguments of counsel on both sides in tbis case, and read carefully tbe record and briefs. ¥e tbink it was a question of fact for tbe jury to determine. We can find no reversible or prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 833, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-v-calhoun-nc-1924.