Heaton v. Brock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Heaton v. Brock

107 S.E. 340, 27 Ga. App. 95, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 711

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1921

Docket12144

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 340 (Heaton v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heaton v. Brock, 107 S.E. 340, 27 Ga. App. 95, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

This was a horse-swap ease, and the action was based’ upon the failure of warranty of title. The motion for a new trial, filed by the defendant, was upon the general grounds. While the evidence was highly conflicting, there was some evidence -to support the verdict for the plaintiff:; and the judgment refusing to grant a new trial is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Complaint; from Carroll superior court •— Judge Terrell. December 23, 1921.

Boykin & Boykin, for plaintiff in error. Smith & Smith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI