Heaton v. Bartlett
13 Wend. 672
This text of 13 Wend. 672 (Heaton v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heaton v. Bartlett, 13 Wend. 672 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).
Opinion
said that such had been the practice, but the judges, upon consultation, had come to the conclusion to change it. Sham pleas and false pleas were stricken out on motion at special terms, and there was no reason why the same course should not be adopted in relation to f rivolous pleas. He therefore granted the motion, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People Ex Rel. Lefever v. Board of Supervisors
34 N.Y. 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)
Reed v. Latson
15 Barb. 2 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)
Darrow v. Miller
5 How. Pr. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Anonymous
7 Hill & Den. 146 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Wend. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-v-bartlett-nysupct-1835.