Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Dick

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Dick

55 F. 23

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois·Decided July 15, 1892·No. No. 870·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

JENKINS, District Judge,

directed an interlocutory decree to be entered as follows, as upon a default: “An order will he entered overruling the demurrer, and requiring an answer by the first Monday of August. An order will also be entered allowing an injunction pendente lite to issue pursuant to the prayer of the bill.”

Subsequently the defendants submitted to a final decree making the injunction perpetual.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JENKINS, District Judge,

directed an interlocutory decree to be entered as follows, as upon a default: “An order will he entered overruling the demurrer, and requiring an answer by the first Monday of August. An order will also be entered allowing an injunction pendente lite to issue pursuant to the prayer of the bill.”

Subsequently the defendants submitted to a final decree making the injunction perpetual.

Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Dick, 55 F. 23 (circtndil 1892).

Pincite

55 F. 23 (Heaton Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Dick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related