Heaton, Justin Douglas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 25, 2013
Docket05-12-00001-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Heaton, Justin Douglas v. State (Heaton, Justin Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heaton, Justin Douglas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS

Justin Douglas Heaton, Appellant v. No. 05-12-00001-CR The State ofTexas, Appellee

State's Motion For Leave to Supplement State's Brief

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:

The State of Texas respectfully requests that this Court grant her Motion for Leave to Supplement State's Brief in the above-styled and -numbered case, in accordance with Rule 38.7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and shows the

following: 1. This case is on appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Dallas County Texas, in cause no. F11-00397-H. 2. Appellant was convicted of Manslaughter, Tex. Penal Code § 19.04, with a deadly weapon fmding, Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12 § 3(g), and enhanced by a prior felony conviction, Tex. Penal Code§ 12.42(b). He was sentenced to

30 years imprisonment. 3. This case is set for submission on oral argument for Tuesday, February 19,

2013, at 9:00a.m. 4. The State now requests, by this motion, leave fo supplement the State's Brief that was filed on October 3, 2012, for the following reasons: a. Page 1 of the State's Brief, under "Statement of the Case," states that "Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of second degree felony intoxication manslaughter .... Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.08(a)

and 49.01 (a) (West 2011)."

oRIGINAL b. This statement of the case is incorrect. Appellant was convicted of manslaughter as shown above. The error is apparently due to a misstatement on the written judgment. c. The attorney of record for the State is no longer employed by the District Attorney's Office, and the undersigned Assistant District Attorney was made aware of the case and this error on Thursday, February 14, 2013. d. The State reasonably believes that justice requires correcting this error before the Court through a Supplemental Brief. The State therefore prays that this Court grant this Motion for Leave to Supplement State's Brief and accept the Supplemental Brief herein flied.

Respectfully submitted,

Craig Watkins Criminal District Attorney Dallas County, Texas

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion was served on David L. Richards, attorney for Appellant, at 3001 West Fifth Street, Ste. 800 on February 15, 2013, and by e-mail to DaveRichards@sbsglobal.net.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 12.42
Texas PE § 12.42(b)
§ 19.04
Texas PE § 19.04
§ 49.08
Texas PE § 49.08(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Heaton, Justin Douglas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaton-justin-douglas-v-state-texapp-2013.